19
2013
Ike Davis Agrees To One Year, $3.1 Million Contract

Updated 1/19
The Mets and Ike Davis have agreed to a one-year, $3.125 million contract, according to Adam Rubin of ESPN New York.
Okay Murph, you’re next…
Updated 1/18
According to Jon Heyman of CBS Sports, Ike Davis and Daniel Murphy have filed for arbitration.
Davis is seeking $3.7 million, and the Mets have countered with a $2.825 million offer.
Murphy is seeking $3.4 million, and the Mets have countered with a $2.55 million offer.
Both Davis and Murphy made the league minimum last year.
Yesterday, the Mets and Bobby Parnell avoided arbitration and agreed to a one-year, $1.7 million contract for 2013.
In 74 games for the Mets in 2012, Parnell, 28, went 5-4 with a 2.49 ERA, allowing 19 earned runs and 20 walks with 61 strikeouts in 68 2/3 innings.
Original Post 1/16
Mets first baseman Ike Davis, second baseman Daniel Murphy and reliever Bobby Parnell have all officially filed for arbitration.
The two sides now have a few weeks to try and reach a settlement before they go to an arbitration hearing in February to determine their 2013 salary. An independent arbitrator will review the evidence presented by each side and then choose one of the salary figures each side presents.
According to Adam Rubin of ESPN New York, the last time a player and the Mets went to arbitration was in 2008 when Scott Boras won on behalf of Oliver Perez and the southpaw earned $6.5 million. Perez’s hearing had snapped a streak of 16 straight seasons in which the Mets settled with all of their arbitration-eligible players.
MLB Trade Rumors reviewed the Mets arbitration eligible players in October and projected the following:
- Daniel Murphy – $3MM
- Bobby Parnell – $1.5MM
- Ike Davis – $2.8MM
Ike Davis became arbitration eligible one year earlier than usual because he earned Super Two player status.
Davis and Murphy will get the most significant raises and using the above projections it will cost the Mets $7.3 million dollars in total.
About the Author: Rob Johnson
21 Comments + Add Comment

NL East Standings
| Team | W | L | Pct. | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braves | 25 | 18 | .581 | - |
| Nationals | 23 | 21 | .523 | 2.5 |
| Phillies | 21 | 23 | .477 | 4.5 |
| Mets | 17 | 24 | .415 | 7.0 |
| Marlins | 12 | 32 | .273 | 13.5 |
Last updated: 05/19/2013
Recent Comments
- DrDooby: on Rafael Montero To Make Spot Start For Las Vegas: Wheeler has a much higher upside than...
- METS62FAN: on Matt Harvey Does It All In Mets 3-2 Win Over Cubs: ITHAS ALSO BEEN MY OBSERVATION THAT ABSOLUTELY...
- Fonzie13: on Mets vs Cubs: Davis Not In Lineup As Gee Looks For A Win In Rubber Match: Recalculate. Over the last decade between 33-37%...
- Metsie: on Keep Daniel Murphy In The Leadoff Spot: No you don't have to walk to...
- Metsie: on Keep Daniel Murphy In The Leadoff Spot: Well they probably do but they won't...

An article by Hojo's Mojo




Daniel Murphy – $3MM
Bobby Parnell – $1.5MM
Ike Davis – $2.8MM
If that’s what they get, I’d say we’d be getting pretty good value.
I agree, especially for Ike Davis (who is capable of hitting 30+ HR’s in a season).
Looking like you may have the numbers for Ike and Murphy swapped…
I expect if Ike got what he did Murphy will settle for around 2.8 or 2.9 Mil considering the numbers they submitted.
They pretty much went down the middle on Ike
I think Sandy had better use the next three days wisely and avoid arbitration with all these guys for one does not want to possibly leave a bad taste in the player’s mouth that will come back to haunt them in the years to come. Might not, but if these players were those who felt the front office had no faith in them back in 2011 and were kicked in the teeth in 2012, a third round of animosity will not help the “re-building” process – for at that time these players are going to be the young veterans those call-ups are going to need.
You know you are actually showing some talent in finding a way to get that stuff in no matter what the post is. It’s like a presidential debate where regardless of the question they are going to get their preplanned talking points in. Bravo.
Hi Trs,
Brought that up because I do think it is all related. Going to arbitration on top of what many players felt about 2011 and 2012 does not help foster any better future relationship as far as the player is concerned. When in arbitration, the team has to argue why the player is not deserving of the higher amount being requested and only deservent of the lesser amount being offered.
With Ike Davis, that also includes his being taken back by what Met officials have told reporters about his attitude and off the field behavior. It would be best for the Mets to avoid the adding further to wounds that could still be remembered down the road when eligible for free agency.
That’s why I suggested not going to arbitration being in the best long-term interests of the Mets – unless the player is being too unreasonable.
If the fans think all this cheapness on players leave a bad taste in thier mouths how do you think the player feels when it’s his Million or so they might be skimping him out of?
You may not like to hear about it but lets face facts Dickey couldn’t WAIT to say what he wanted to say when they introduced him to Toronto…
And Sandy is not lilely to stay on Hairston’s christmas card list either….
I thik Parnell got the memo – open your mouth to complain and you better be able to speak Canadian.
Better than having to learn to speak Australian.
Ouch
I was wondering why Ike was arbitration eligible. Thanks for clearing that up for me.
Now I know how Sandy felt when asked what he thought was wrong with Ike Davis. Since I’m not a business person I can only comment as an observer. I have to side with Sandy on this one. Ike’s agent is asking for basically the same amount that Jason Heyward agreed upon with Atlanta to avoid arbitration and at this stage of his three year career, Ike is not the player that Heward is.
Though I don’t know if Murphy has earned the $3.4 million he’s asking for, I think Sandy is short changing him just a slight bit with his counter proposal.
Again, only an observer.
the braves compromised and inked Heyward on a one-year, $3.65 contract.
meaning he was probably asking for alot more than that.
Ike asking for 3.65 means he could probably settle for 3 mil even.
after what the team put him in through in September, it makes no sense to play hardball with him now.
Hi Just,
You were off by just about .03 percent – do you what that additional one-hundred grand comes out to in terms of WAR?
All three of these guys made just $500k last season, so it’s going to cost the Mets btwn $6mm-$7mm more annually this season for these players, while still good value, not at basically league minimum anymore. I guess this is where Bay and Wrights deferred money is going since they’re going into 2013 with the worst bullpen in baseball and pretty bad OF…really frustrating off-season..
Also, I think this weeks dribble from Sandy that ZWheeler and d’Arnaud have a chance to make team out of spring training is laughable, that the Mets would give up on their super 2 status and let them get to arbitration a year early, when they have made zero effort at upgrading 2013 roster to have any chance at being a playoff team. No way they make it unless they shock me and pick up some vets for bullpen and an real OF piece.
I think it’s a shame because I don’t think any team is too far off from making playoff push and Mets have enough guys that have real upside potential this season that not adding basic major league level talent on the 2013 roster to even give them a chance is just depressing going into this season.
Maybe unrelated, even thou Buck had his worst major league season in 2012, I think he could be a hugh upgrade to Thole who I thought was about the most non- threatening hitter in baseball last year. At least Buck gives you the fear factor that he could hit a Hr and have an actual slugging percentage. I literally think its a difference maker in a lineup..if they didn’t decide to punt the outfield position..and punt the relief core, no way we don’t squander many leads with this bullpen…
Time to lock Murphy and Ike up.
See if you can get Ike locked up for 3 years or so with some options. Not a huge commitment but still offers some stability or both parties. It doesn’t have to be a big money deal.
The thing with Murphy is, and I love the guy for so many reasons, his type of player is not really an endangered species. Especially with the Mets.
Murphy is not worth a long term deal. He’s a good player but on any other team he is a utility player
Like Ike and his agent, Murph and his agent are going to have to come down to more what the Mets have offered him. 3.4MM is kinda steep for Murph.
And then there was one. OK Mets, Let’s get Murphy done.