They are still talking about adding an extra wild card , but it won’t end there. The one-game playoff is bound to drag on to three games, then five ….
I realize the old format will never be again, but the more you add to the playoff format the more the sport is diluted. The season drags on long enough as it is and this won’t help matters. What if there’s two teams vying for the final seed? Do you add another game?
The suggested format would allow the three division winners first-round byes, but what if one of the wild cards has a superior record to a division winner. That’s not entirely fair, either.
As it is, the integrity of the regular season is compromised because of interleague play the unbalanced schedule as not every team runs the same race to October. Unfortunately, I never see them doing away with interleague play although it is not nearly the success Major League Baseball portrays it to be. Interleauge play is compelling in New York, Chicago and Los Angeles, but other than that, who really cares?
Yes, they’ll show up in Pittsburgh when the Yankees are in town, but there’s nothing exciting about seeing the Royals or Mariners come in. There’s just not the draw MLB executives believe.
Sadly, as long as Bud Selig is commissioner, interleague play is here to stay.
If they really want to do something about the integrity of the regular season, and by extension, the playoffs, here’s a system that could work.
I’d do away with the division format and simply have the two leagues. If they insist on interleague play, they could structure it where every team plays the same schedule. The same schedule promotes fairness.
From there, I’d take the top four teams and seed them so one plays four and two plays three. That would be a fairer and more equitable solution.