Comments on: Rangers Sign Darvish To Six-Year, $60 Million Deal

By: theonlymaskman

theonlymaskman — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:01:27 +0000

It’s sad when staying ahead of Washington is our main concern. Unfortunately, we will finish behind the Nats even without Darvish on their side.

Alex68 — Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:51:37 +0000

FI.

trs86 — Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:43:06 +0000

Sure.

Hank — Thu, 19 Jan 2012 04:18:54 +0000

Anyone else rooting for the Rangers to also sign Prince just so he doesn’t end up in Washington??

Bob L — Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:27:46 +0000

Good deal. Kid’s gotta be for real. Even Bobby V said as much….wish, just wish, we had had the cash to even entertain the bid.

trs86 — Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:06:32 +0000

Sometimes… often…. you bring the issues on yourself.

Mr North Jersey — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:57:47 +0000

So the Rangers paid in total $111.7M for Darvish.
$51.7M bid
$60M contract

MLB says you can watch the press conference at 6:15 here.
http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?topic_id=6261176

Joe Diaz — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:57:43 +0000

WFAN announced that the contract was for 50 million.

jessep — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:47:56 +0000

nice job. I mean I know I was such a moron for thinking the total investment would be $125m. I mean I was WAY off, man I’m so stupid! (sarcasm)

60/6 is better for Texas than I thought. Nice job by Ryan and his staff.