What else was Sandy Alderson going to say?
In a classic case of GM-Speak, Alderson said in a conference call, “I certainly wouldn’t draw any conclusions from this transaction,’’ regarding the trade of Francisco Rodriguez to Milwaukee.
He might be the only one.
This was about dumping salary, totally understandable considering the Mets didn’t want to pick up Rodriguez’s $17.5 million option. How well the Mets have played was irrelevant because clearing themselves of the option was their primary objective, although Alderson downplayed this issue.
He wasn’t believable.
Alderson insisted the Mets’ goal the rest of the way will be winning games, but that’s a tough sell considering he just traded their closer, and is actively looking to move Carlos Beltran, and wouldn’t say no to anybody asking about Jose Reyes.
According to Buster Olney of ESPN, the Mets are looking to acquire a “Grade A” prospect in a deal for Carlos Beltran. As one of my MMO colleagues aptly stated yesterday in another post, Beltran is as good as gone no matter what the Mets record is.
Trading Rodriguez offers payroll flexibility, but realistically we’re only talking about 2012, and Reyes reportedly will seek six or seven years.
Alderson said there’s no connection between Rodriguez and possibly trading Beltran, but what other conclusion can you make? The Mets want to shave payroll and aren’t a realistic contender, so the fire sale seems the only realistic way for this season to play itself out.
Anybody can see that, so why can’t Alderson just admit it and spare us the GM-Speak?