<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Mets Have Two Legit Rookie of the Year Candidates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:49:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157645</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 23:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you watch the way Turner works a pitcher and looks to get the pitch he wants, you can see that this kid has a very good idea about what he&#039;s doing at the plate. It indicates a very strong foundation and approach on which his hitting will evolve in the big leagues. It does NOT indicate that he is over achieving with a small sample size, or that he is playing over his head. He is a very well prepared and polished ball player, which comes from paying his dues in the minors, combined with a lot of natural hitting ability. But many fans on here don&#039;t judge a player&#039;s talents with their own eyes. They judge a player&#039;s talents based solely on numbers. Right Jessup? I guess if you are incapable of interpreting the details of the game, you must rely on the numbers alone. Let me enlighten you, if you think Turner will blow away with the morning mist, he won&#039;t, he is the real deal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you watch the way Turner works a pitcher and looks to get the pitch he wants, you can see that this kid has a very good idea about what he&#8217;s doing at the plate. It indicates a very strong foundation and approach on which his hitting will evolve in the big leagues. It does NOT indicate that he is over achieving with a small sample size, or that he is playing over his head. He is a very well prepared and polished ball player, which comes from paying his dues in the minors, combined with a lot of natural hitting ability. But many fans on here don&#8217;t judge a player&#8217;s talents with their own eyes. They judge a player&#8217;s talents based solely on numbers. Right Jessup? I guess if you are incapable of interpreting the details of the game, you must rely on the numbers alone. Let me enlighten you, if you think Turner will blow away with the morning mist, he won&#8217;t, he is the real deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157640</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 23:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who dat? Does he play LF?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who dat? Does he play LF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157634</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 23:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Phillie Phuckhead has a secret mancrush on the Mets, that&#039;s why he&#039;s on our site.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Phillie Phuckhead has a secret mancrush on the Mets, that&#8217;s why he&#8217;s on our site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157632</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 23:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Omar had nothing to do with getting Turner. He was brought in on the insistence of Wayne Krivsky.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omar had nothing to do with getting Turner. He was brought in on the insistence of Wayne Krivsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metsie</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157618</link>
		<dc:creator>Metsie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 22:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No he&#039;s not cano, But he may be the NEXT guy someone refers to when they say he is like, {insert name here}

Point I was making is the whole purpose of looking at stats is to see what a gy is capable of not how long he was capable of it.

If you know what the guy is capable of doing then it&#039;s just a matter of keeping him doing it!

Until the guy actually fails you have to believe in the numbers that are there because like it or not, believe it or not he HAS done it!
Sampling is only good for evening out trends and fluctuations, But if you can do something you should be able to repeat it. Sampling answer if he did, doing it proved he can!


In August you could see this as an infield...

Davis at 1st, Turner at 2nd, Tejada at SS, Murphy at 3rd.

(Swap Turner and Murphy&#039;s positions if you want!)

We would probably win as many games as we do now Only Davis would be the only real HR hitter so we play more little ball.

Who knows if those guys will ever be superstars in this league, the bottom line is if they can beat the Phillies without Wright and Reyes and Davis on the DL they can beat them when Reyes and Wright get traded and Davis is back.

Not what I would like to see but considering how well Turner and the rest have played it sure would make a ton of sense to Sandy to go with them and solve all the payroll issues in one Trading deadline!

And if they manage to keep us in contention while Wright and Davis get healthy who knows they may be sent off for pitching instead.

Point I was getting to above is be thankful and happy they are doing well. No matter how long it may last at least they have opened some eyes to what they are capable of and therefroe valuable in a trade or in allowing another player to be traded to make us better!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No he&#8217;s not cano, But he may be the NEXT guy someone refers to when they say he is like, {insert name here}</p>
<p>Point I was making is the whole purpose of looking at stats is to see what a gy is capable of not how long he was capable of it.</p>
<p>If you know what the guy is capable of doing then it&#8217;s just a matter of keeping him doing it!</p>
<p>Until the guy actually fails you have to believe in the numbers that are there because like it or not, believe it or not he HAS done it!<br />
Sampling is only good for evening out trends and fluctuations, But if you can do something you should be able to repeat it. Sampling answer if he did, doing it proved he can!</p>
<p>In August you could see this as an infield&#8230;</p>
<p>Davis at 1st, Turner at 2nd, Tejada at SS, Murphy at 3rd.</p>
<p>(Swap Turner and Murphy&#8217;s positions if you want!)</p>
<p>We would probably win as many games as we do now Only Davis would be the only real HR hitter so we play more little ball.</p>
<p>Who knows if those guys will ever be superstars in this league, the bottom line is if they can beat the Phillies without Wright and Reyes and Davis on the DL they can beat them when Reyes and Wright get traded and Davis is back.</p>
<p>Not what I would like to see but considering how well Turner and the rest have played it sure would make a ton of sense to Sandy to go with them and solve all the payroll issues in one Trading deadline!</p>
<p>And if they manage to keep us in contention while Wright and Davis get healthy who knows they may be sent off for pitching instead.</p>
<p>Point I was getting to above is be thankful and happy they are doing well. No matter how long it may last at least they have opened some eyes to what they are capable of and therefroe valuable in a trade or in allowing another player to be traded to make us better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarge</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157589</link>
		<dc:creator>sarge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 21:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t have a problem with talking about the possibilites of Gee or Turner being in consideration for ROY because their performance so far merits it.
No one knows what will happen, it is a long season but Turner has shown when he was on that RBI streak and went cold that he could come back and return to hitting the breaking ball and taking the ball to the right side.
Gee showed last year against Braves, playoff bound team not scrubs, that he could pitch against good teams.
His start in Chicago and early season BP innings were bumps and I hope that Terry now sees that Gee needs to remain in rotation, when Santana returns then someone else can be bumped.

How gratifying it is as a Met fan to see some young players come up to Majors, play, produce and help team to succeed since the last time before Ike was Jose and David.

It gives me as a loyal fan optimism for the rest of this season and hope for the future.

No one knows what will happen, injuries, cold streaks but these two guys have shown us that they belong and I hope that SA and Mets do not trade them away cause Gee especially can be a consistent innings eating, keep your team in the game with a low WHIP.

Turner could be our 2b or platoon with Murph or be 2b and Murph can be our super sub after Ike and David return.

Great post and too bad you have trolls that can&#039;t let Met fans have a glimmer of hope for this season and next.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with talking about the possibilites of Gee or Turner being in consideration for ROY because their performance so far merits it.<br />
No one knows what will happen, it is a long season but Turner has shown when he was on that RBI streak and went cold that he could come back and return to hitting the breaking ball and taking the ball to the right side.<br />
Gee showed last year against Braves, playoff bound team not scrubs, that he could pitch against good teams.<br />
His start in Chicago and early season BP innings were bumps and I hope that Terry now sees that Gee needs to remain in rotation, when Santana returns then someone else can be bumped.</p>
<p>How gratifying it is as a Met fan to see some young players come up to Majors, play, produce and help team to succeed since the last time before Ike was Jose and David.</p>
<p>It gives me as a loyal fan optimism for the rest of this season and hope for the future.</p>
<p>No one knows what will happen, injuries, cold streaks but these two guys have shown us that they belong and I hope that SA and Mets do not trade them away cause Gee especially can be a consistent innings eating, keep your team in the game with a low WHIP.</p>
<p>Turner could be our 2b or platoon with Murph or be 2b and Murph can be our super sub after Ike and David return.</p>
<p>Great post and too bad you have trolls that can&#8217;t let Met fans have a glimmer of hope for this season and next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t agee</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157577</link>
		<dc:creator>t agee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 20:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Turner and Murphy can handle 2B until Tejada or Havens is ready.  They might cost you 3 or 4 games defensively but will make up for it with the bat and their versatility in the infield.

     It&#039;s not Robinson Cano but it&#039;s not Cora, Catalonotto, Castillo or Hessman either.

     Live with it.  Put the money into the RIGHT guy when he comes around.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turner and Murphy can handle 2B until Tejada or Havens is ready.  They might cost you 3 or 4 games defensively but will make up for it with the bat and their versatility in the infield.</p>
<p>     It&#8217;s not Robinson Cano but it&#8217;s not Cora, Catalonotto, Castillo or Hessman either.</p>
<p>     Live with it.  Put the money into the RIGHT guy when he comes around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessep</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157560</link>
		<dc:creator>jessep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 20:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here we go again alex68... 

Darwin Barney 193 at bats.
Justin Turner 92 at bats. 

Turner isn&#039;t even a qualified hitter yet based on at bats/plate appearances]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go again alex68&#8230; </p>
<p>Darwin Barney 193 at bats.<br />
Justin Turner 92 at bats. </p>
<p>Turner isn&#8217;t even a qualified hitter yet based on at bats/plate appearances</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t agee</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157574</link>
		<dc:creator>t agee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 20:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like both of theses guys.  Gee was a great pick in the 21st round and Turner a real good waiver wire acquisition.  Both of these moves are the types of things we should be doing a lot more of.

     Turner is the kind of guy who might be a late bloomer or he might just be a guy who can play good MLB while he&#039;s in his prime.  There are a lot of guys like Turner that don&#039;t clog up your roster, cost you millions and fail to live up to the expectations when they are near the end of their career.  The trick is to forecast ahead of time by having a couple of in house Justin Turners when your current 2B man is about to become a free agent.  A Justin Turner at 26 with 5 full minor league seasons CAN sometimes step up even for just a year or two and provide a lot more than someone nearing the end of their career.  It&#039;s a much better move than signing the wrong guy and having to live with him for 3 or 4 years.

     Gee can flat out pitch through a Major League lineup.  His change can get crushed but he sets it up so well.  He&#039;s not going to be an ace but he can be a really important part of the rotation.  I liked this kid the first inning I saw him pitch.  I think this was Omar&#039;s best pick by far.  21st round 4th or 5th starter that can keep you in the game, every game.  That is damn good.

     Mostly these guys are 25 and 26.  Not 20.  That makes a huge difference.  So does having a few of these types around.  Much better than having a 20 year old come up here and not be ready or a multi millionaire play like **** and you have to then live with it and hope you can get something out of him.

     Good job in getting both of these guys by Omar.  Hope we get a few more to fill in around here and there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like both of theses guys.  Gee was a great pick in the 21st round and Turner a real good waiver wire acquisition.  Both of these moves are the types of things we should be doing a lot more of.</p>
<p>     Turner is the kind of guy who might be a late bloomer or he might just be a guy who can play good MLB while he&#8217;s in his prime.  There are a lot of guys like Turner that don&#8217;t clog up your roster, cost you millions and fail to live up to the expectations when they are near the end of their career.  The trick is to forecast ahead of time by having a couple of in house Justin Turners when your current 2B man is about to become a free agent.  A Justin Turner at 26 with 5 full minor league seasons CAN sometimes step up even for just a year or two and provide a lot more than someone nearing the end of their career.  It&#8217;s a much better move than signing the wrong guy and having to live with him for 3 or 4 years.</p>
<p>     Gee can flat out pitch through a Major League lineup.  His change can get crushed but he sets it up so well.  He&#8217;s not going to be an ace but he can be a really important part of the rotation.  I liked this kid the first inning I saw him pitch.  I think this was Omar&#8217;s best pick by far.  21st round 4th or 5th starter that can keep you in the game, every game.  That is damn good.</p>
<p>     Mostly these guys are 25 and 26.  Not 20.  That makes a huge difference.  So does having a few of these types around.  Much better than having a 20 year old come up here and not be ready or a multi millionaire play like **** and you have to then live with it and hope you can get something out of him.</p>
<p>     Good job in getting both of these guys by Omar.  Hope we get a few more to fill in around here and there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metsie</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157569</link>
		<dc:creator>Metsie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 20:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not going to comment on which is better but I did want to point out that the whole purpose of using statistics is based on the assumption that what they have done already is what they will do in general.

In the case of percentages BA OBP and SLG doesn&#039;t care how many samples!
If you are saying the numbers can&#039;t be trusted with low samples then how can you trust all the other numbers as well?

Who can say a kid with 500 PA who hit .300 will ever do it again?

You say 100-200 PA or Qualified, is that really enough? 500 isn&#039;t even enough, Try it on Pagan and see if last year alone is enough to prove he is that guy who put up those numbers for REAL!

Point is his NUMBERS are good. You choose not to believe them until a certain amount of time has past.

But you forget the WHOLE reason for looking at the stats...
CAN HE DO A GOOD JOB?
If the number say he DID a good job then he is a GOOD player regardless of the PA involved. HE IS CAPABLE of being that good! How long (Samples) he does it is irrelevant provided he CAN do it!

And if he can then it&#039;s just a matter of doing what he is capable of in every game!
The numbers say he is capable, the numbers say he is capable of being an MLB player!

How long he does it is the job of the manager and coaches to keep him doing what he is capable of and to try and get even more by perfecting what he is capable of doing!

So this sample thing is just an excuse to not count something good as being MET Good in order to press the notion that this team is deadder than the pirates and needs to be flushed!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not going to comment on which is better but I did want to point out that the whole purpose of using statistics is based on the assumption that what they have done already is what they will do in general.</p>
<p>In the case of percentages BA OBP and SLG doesn&#8217;t care how many samples!<br />
If you are saying the numbers can&#8217;t be trusted with low samples then how can you trust all the other numbers as well?</p>
<p>Who can say a kid with 500 PA who hit .300 will ever do it again?</p>
<p>You say 100-200 PA or Qualified, is that really enough? 500 isn&#8217;t even enough, Try it on Pagan and see if last year alone is enough to prove he is that guy who put up those numbers for REAL!</p>
<p>Point is his NUMBERS are good. You choose not to believe them until a certain amount of time has past.</p>
<p>But you forget the WHOLE reason for looking at the stats&#8230;<br />
CAN HE DO A GOOD JOB?<br />
If the number say he DID a good job then he is a GOOD player regardless of the PA involved. HE IS CAPABLE of being that good! How long (Samples) he does it is irrelevant provided he CAN do it!</p>
<p>And if he can then it&#8217;s just a matter of doing what he is capable of in every game!<br />
The numbers say he is capable, the numbers say he is capable of being an MLB player!</p>
<p>How long he does it is the job of the manager and coaches to keep him doing what he is capable of and to try and get even more by perfecting what he is capable of doing!</p>
<p>So this sample thing is just an excuse to not count something good as being MET Good in order to press the notion that this team is deadder than the pirates and needs to be flushed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donal</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157564</link>
		<dc:creator>Donal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 19:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I dont need attention, nor am I looking for any.&quot;

Which is why you are trolling on a Mets site.

&quot;But when the ridiculous title of this post came across my reader,&quot;

And you found it because...

&quot;I had to see what nonsense it was referring to and couldn’t believe it was about a scrub who is now with their third organization, and a non-prospect pitcher with below average stuff.&quot;

And until 6 months ago, you knuckle draggers were sucking off Jayson Werth. 

Look, we get it. Philllies fans hate their lives. It&#039;s understandable. Most of you wake up in Philadelphia. The rest wake up in Southern New Jersey and you hope to someday upgrade to Philly. That would make anyone angry enough to puke on a child.

Good for your team and their success the last few years. Congrats on winning the same number of World Series as the Mets. Granted, your team has been around since the Civil War, but they still got 2. I&#039;m sure that makes up for being the losingest franchise in sports history.

And if blindly lashing out at a smarter fanbase makes you feel manly and forget about the agonizing depression that is your life, welcome to the boards. I expect to see many more enlightened comments from you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I dont need attention, nor am I looking for any.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which is why you are trolling on a Mets site.</p>
<p>&#8220;But when the ridiculous title of this post came across my reader,&#8221;</p>
<p>And you found it because&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;I had to see what nonsense it was referring to and couldn’t believe it was about a scrub who is now with their third organization, and a non-prospect pitcher with below average stuff.&#8221;</p>
<p>And until 6 months ago, you knuckle draggers were sucking off Jayson Werth. </p>
<p>Look, we get it. Philllies fans hate their lives. It&#8217;s understandable. Most of you wake up in Philadelphia. The rest wake up in Southern New Jersey and you hope to someday upgrade to Philly. That would make anyone angry enough to puke on a child.</p>
<p>Good for your team and their success the last few years. Congrats on winning the same number of World Series as the Mets. Granted, your team has been around since the Civil War, but they still got 2. I&#8217;m sure that makes up for being the losingest franchise in sports history.</p>
<p>And if blindly lashing out at a smarter fanbase makes you feel manly and forget about the agonizing depression that is your life, welcome to the boards. I expect to see many more enlightened comments from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessep</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157549</link>
		<dc:creator>jessep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 19:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess I thought the award gets handed to a player... in the future. And not after 92 at bats.

Silly me alex.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I thought the award gets handed to a player&#8230; in the future. And not after 92 at bats.</p>
<p>Silly me alex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donal</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157563</link>
		<dc:creator>Donal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 19:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re talking prospects, we&#039;re talking players.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re talking prospects, we&#8217;re talking players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex68</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157562</link>
		<dc:creator>alex68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 19:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[30 more at bats and he&#039;s in.. am i correct??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30 more at bats and he&#8217;s in.. am i correct??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metsie</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157561</link>
		<dc:creator>Metsie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 19:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That probably says more about Baseball Americ&#039;a list than Turner or Gee]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That probably says more about Baseball Americ&#8217;a list than Turner or Gee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessep</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157538</link>
		<dc:creator>jessep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 19:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m being cautious here. I find that too often we get sucked into a young player because he has an awesome few weeks. Heck, remember Murphy&#039;s hype? I do... I bought a shirt in 2009! 

Turner has 92 at bats, a full 100 behind Darwin Barney whom I suggest should be the NL ROY right now. That&#039;s a long way to go before you can compare apples to apples. 

You&#039;re on to something with Gee because there are not many NL Pitcher ROY candidates. So he&#039;d at least be in the tops there... Brandon Beachy is probably the only other pitcher candidate in my book right now. 

I want to see more before I annoint anybody. Turner is going to slow down, you know he will. The key with him is where he lands when he slows down...

But still, I&#039;ll wait and see how it goes before I get excited about the future here]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m being cautious here. I find that too often we get sucked into a young player because he has an awesome few weeks. Heck, remember Murphy&#8217;s hype? I do&#8230; I bought a shirt in 2009! </p>
<p>Turner has 92 at bats, a full 100 behind Darwin Barney whom I suggest should be the NL ROY right now. That&#8217;s a long way to go before you can compare apples to apples. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re on to something with Gee because there are not many NL Pitcher ROY candidates. So he&#8217;d at least be in the tops there&#8230; Brandon Beachy is probably the only other pitcher candidate in my book right now. </p>
<p>I want to see more before I annoint anybody. Turner is going to slow down, you know he will. The key with him is where he lands when he slows down&#8230;</p>
<p>But still, I&#8217;ll wait and see how it goes before I get excited about the future here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XtreemIcon</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157556</link>
		<dc:creator>XtreemIcon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 19:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Am I the only one on the Allen Craig bandwagon?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one on the Allen Craig bandwagon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex68</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157555</link>
		<dc:creator>alex68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 19:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[here we go, me know it all is at it again.. 
barney 311 1 24
turner 337 1 21 in 100 less at bats...

for once, SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here we go, me know it all is at it again..<br />
barney 311 1 24<br />
turner 337 1 21 in 100 less at bats&#8230;</p>
<p>for once, SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157547</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 18:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At this point, I&#039;m betting Turner has the better chance of sustaining his success. He can definitely win the ROY as nobody is really running away with it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this point, I&#8217;m betting Turner has the better chance of sustaining his success. He can definitely win the ROY as nobody is really running away with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex68</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2011/05/the-mets-have-two-legit-rookie-of-the-year-candidates.html#comment-157542</link>
		<dc:creator>alex68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 18:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=51359#comment-157542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[future?? we&#039;re talking about roty, hell, haven&#039;t you heard of many roth who never panned out? hamelin 1994, yunerky, etc... come on bro, he&#039;s just talking candidate jesse P, he&#039;s not talking about futures or that they&#039;re #1 prospect&#039;s or anything like that, he&#039;s just saying &quot;candidates for ROTY!!!!&quot; .. jesus..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>future?? we&#8217;re talking about roty, hell, haven&#8217;t you heard of many roth who never panned out? hamelin 1994, yunerky, etc&#8230; come on bro, he&#8217;s just talking candidate jesse P, he&#8217;s not talking about futures or that they&#8217;re #1 prospect&#8217;s or anything like that, he&#8217;s just saying &#8220;candidates for ROTY!!!!&#8221; .. jesus..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Content Delivery Network via smhttp.18058.nexcesscdn.net/808D60/wordpress

Served from: metsmerizedonline.com @ 2013-06-18 00:59:10 -->