Jan
28
2010

“We Believe In Comebacks.” (Sure We Do)

We all share great memories of 1986. One that stands out for me was actually the pre-game show prior to Game 7. Red Sox 2nd basemen Marty Barrett was being interviewed. The reporter asked him if he felt confident the Sox could overcome the Mets miraculous comeback in Game 6. Barrett answered eloquently, in a politically correct way as athletes often do. Then at the end of the interview he added the comment, ‘We should win.’ However, there was confidence lacking in his voice. He looked at the reporter seeking agreement, reassurance. It wasn’t so much a defiant statement but rather almost a question. We should win. (Shouldn’t we?)

It was at that point I knew we would win Game 7. There was no doubt about it. Even when we trailed 3-0 in the middle innings, we all knew we’d prevail.

I’ve seen the Mets new slogan for 2010: We Believe in Comebacks. I saw the commercial with David and Johan and John Maine and Manuel. One by one they all take turns stating ‘We Believe in Comebacks.’ It makes me wonder. Do they? Do we? Or is this just another catch phrase by the Mets organization to dull our senses for another disappointing season?

Just a few years ago our slogan was ‘The Future is Now.’ Today we believe in comebacks. We went straight from talking about the future to talking about the past. The only thing missing was the present. “We believe in comebacks” is supposed to conjure up memories of recent past glory. But what recent glory have we had? 2008 when we lost on the last day of the season? 2007 when…oh yea, we lost on the last day of the season? Or 2006 when we lost in 7 games to an inferior Cardinals team?

How far have we fallen? Just take a look at what occurred on January 19th. Bengie Molina, who we had our sights on all winter, re-signed with the Giants. Many Mets fans, myself included, were fine with not acquiring him. But take a step back and look at the big picture. A 35 year-old catcher decided not to come play for us and stay in San Francisco for less money and a one year contract. When a 35 year old catcher accepts less money NOT to play here, what does that tell you?

We turned our focus to Ben Sheets. This is the same Ben Sheets who averaged only 148 IP from 06-08 before missing all of 09 with an elbow injury. Should we have handed over $10 million to Sheets? Maybe, but probably not. On the other hand look at it from his point of view. If you were coming back from an elbow injury would YOU trust your livelihood to this Mets organization? We don’t exactly have stellar success lately handling injured players.

We were promised that our pitching would be improved this winter. It hasn’t happened. Roy Halladay, Cliff Lee, John Lackey, Javy Vazquez, Joel Pineiro and Randy Wolf are all with new teams in 2010. And what have we done? Now we are going after 42 year-old ex-Brave John Smoltz?

We did just sign Gary Matthews JR, however. I would like to point out that’s Gary Matthews JUNIOR, not SENIOR. (With the Mets you never know.) This Gary Matthews is 35 years old and after wearing out his welcome with the Angels, he comes to New York with his .248 BA.

Just a few short years ago the Mets were the class of the NL, favored to win the pennant. The normally quiet Carlos Beltran proclaimed to the Phillies and the rest of the league that ‘We are the team to beat.’ Sadly, we have been beaten.

Several days ago on this very website, Joe D wrote a very interesting article debating who would be a better signing for us: Tatis or Ryan Garko. While it was a great article and garnered many valid points and comments, it displayed yet again how far this team, this club, this organization, has fallen. And really, how low our expectations are as Mets fans. Our main rivals, the Phillies, won the NL pennant but still found a way to add Roy Halladay and Placido Polanco. Our cross-town rivals won the World Series and found a way to add Curtis Granderson and Javier Vazquez. And here we are debating the pros and cons of Fernando Tatis, supposed to be enthused with the signing of a 35 year old outfielder and licking our chops at obtaining a 42 year old pitcher.

It seems like other teams, both in our division and in our city build winners. We simply look to fill holes and eat up innings.

Over a period of a few short years we seemed to be building a dynasty, acquiring some of the best players in the game. We signed 5 tool superstar Carlos Beltran, future Hall of Famers Pedro Martinez and Billy Wagner, RBI machine Carlos Delgado, the best LHP in the game in Johan Santana. When Wagner got injured we obtained Frankie Rodriguez following his historic season of 62 saves. Sure, many of these players came here for the money. But also they wanted to play for a winner, for a team that was heading in the right direction. Ask yourself this: Would these guys sign with us today? Would they do it again if they had to?

But it’s okay, though. We do believe in comebacks. After all, David and company say so. Perhaps we can add some Marty Barrett influence into the commercials also. We Believe in Comebacks. (Don’t We?)

Related Posts with Thumbnails

About the Author: Rob Silverman

11 Comments + Add Comment

  • No.

  • It’s obvious that the Mets are taking the position that the return of injured players will makes us better. However, Dalgado is not returning and so Tatis will now share 1B with Murphy. So we’re worse at 1B. No replacement for Schneider and now Santos and Blanco share C. So we’re worse at C. Beltran is reinjured and so Pagan will start the year in CF. So we’re worse at CF. Reyes has not yet shown he can run. So SS is a ?. So we’re banking on returning surgeries to make the rotation better. That remains to be seen and Maine and Perez can flame out on a moments notice. The only place we’re demonstrably better is LF wth Bay. He is not going to carry this team just as Davis couldn’t last year. This is not going to be pretty! That comeback looks to be pretty thin on real meat and flame to cook it.

    • That should have been David not Davis. Sorry.

    • I have to disagree with you about catcher. You can’t get much worse than Brian Schneider.

      • It’s my belief you can’t count Blanco as having replaced Schneider. Schneider was the starter and Blanco is a sub. That elevates Santos to starter and both Manuel and Warden have condemned him as a negative influence on the starters. Blanco is only a sub, how does he fill that gap? So we are net down at the catcher position IMO.

  • we believe in comebacks when our team shows some sign of emotion. the 86 team had that emotion. they weren’t going to let anyone beat them. they had a certain attitude about them that this team has lacked the past 4 seasons, maybe even 5. this team is laid back, without a sense of, well anything. they need a manager who isn’t going to take this laid back attitude the team has. they need a manager who will “light the fire under their asses”, who will get them to go out there and play there hearts out. game 6 of 86, carter, mitchell, knight, all said they weren’t going to make the last out of the game, and they didn’t. would any of these mets say that?

    • Yes, you’re so right, Tim. I’ve also wondered the same thing–about this current team ‘making the last out.’

      To take it 1 step further, I could see one of the current players hitting ‘that slow roller’ down the 1b line to Buckner—and standing in the batters box–assuming it would go foul! Mookie ran all out

      • Worse even, just standing in the box because he assumed Buckner would make the play.

        • exactly!!!! i don’t think anyone on this team would have hustled down the line on that ground ball. thats the problem with the team, they have no heart, no desire!

  • Good points Rob.

    I cant help but feel we have a long season ahead of us

  • Hey Tim…you’re right, the ’86 team had a lot of emotion, it was called coke. lol.

NL East Standings

TeamWLPct.GB
Nationals2618.591 -
Braves2620.5651.0
Mets2421.5332.5
Marlins2421.5332.5
Phillies2323.5004.0

Last updated: 05/25/2012

Recent Comments

Write Your Own Mets Post

Advertisement

Advertisement