<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reason #17 To Retire Keith Hernandez&#8217;s Number</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html</link>
	<description>A New York Mets Blog For Diehard Mets Fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:17:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reason #17 To Retire Keith Hernandez&#39;s Number &#124; Mets Merized Online &#124; Daily Hot Topic</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-39850</link>
		<dc:creator>Reason #17 To Retire Keith Hernandez&#39;s Number &#124; Mets Merized Online &#124; Daily Hot Topic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-39850</guid>
		<description>[...] posted here: Reason #17 To Retire Keith Hernandez&#039;s Number &#124; Mets Merized Online     Posted in Uncategorized, keith hernandez &#124; Tags: a-leader-, anguishing-at-the, former-first, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted here: Reason #17 To Retire Keith Hernandez&#39;s Number | Mets Merized Online     Posted in Uncategorized, keith hernandez | Tags: a-leader-, anguishing-at-the, former-first, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38493</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38493</guid>
		<description>Great post. In addition to all the great stats he had, can you name a player other than Keith who you wanted up in the big spot? Not then, and no one since. The man was as clutch as they come and he transformed our pathetic franchise into a NL beast. 

You can find my Hernandez retired numbered tshirts at www.theprintmen.com (piazza also). 

bryan
Metslifer.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. In addition to all the great stats he had, can you name a player other than Keith who you wanted up in the big spot? Not then, and no one since. The man was as clutch as they come and he transformed our pathetic franchise into a NL beast. </p>
<p>You can find my Hernandez retired numbered tshirts at <a href="http://www.theprintmen.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.theprintmen.com</a> (piazza also). </p>
<p>bryan<br />
Metslifer.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38445</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38445</guid>
		<description>Support for Piazza seems stronger than for Hernandez, and it seems most posters feel it is inevitable that 31 will be retired - the only thing that might stand in its way is if Piazza is inducted into the HOF as a Dodger.  So, I want to claims that if Piazza&#039;s 31 ought to be retired, then so should Hernandez&#039;s 17.  I am a Hernandez partisan since my but I will try to make the case for Hernandez purely on the grounds that his personal achievement with the Mets was at least comparable to Piazza&#039;s, and the team&#039;s success was superior.  (As an aside, I want to point out Hernandez&#039;s impact in helping to change the culture of the club into a winning one and the obvious reverence his Mets teammates hold for him.)

Hernandez (http://www.ultimatemets.com/profile.php?PlayerCode=0340)
Seas.  G   AB   R     H    HR    RBI     BB    IBB  AVG   SLG     OBP
7     880 3164  455   939  80    468    471    59  .297  .429    .387  

Piazza (http://www.ultimatemets.com/profile.php?PlayerCode=0600)
Seas.  G   A     R    H    HR     RBI     BB     IBB    AVG    SLG    OBP
8     972 3478 532   1028  220    655    424     82   .296    .542   .373

I&#039;ll admit that Piazza&#039;s numbers are better, but Hernandez is a surprisingly productive, and in 3 of his seasons (1983, 1988, and 1989) he played in fewer than 95 games for the Mets, whereas Piazza played at least 109 games in all but one season (yes, Piazza was more durable, so points to him).  However, if you go the websites I got the data from and look at Hernandez&#039;s four peak seasons with the Mets, 1984-1987, you will see an extremely productive player; he averaged 15 HRs, 90 rbi, 88 runs scored, .305 avg.  Piazza&#039;s four peak seasons (1999-2002):  37 HRs, 107 rbi, 85 runs scored, .302 avg.  I think it&#039;s interesting to note that Piazza only generated about 15 more runs a season despite hitting about 22 more home runs a season. 

During Hernandez&#039;s four year peak the Mets&#039; average record was 97-65; they had one first place finish, one NLCS, and one World Championship, as well as three second place finishes where average number of games back was four.  Had there been a Wild Card then, the Mets would have made the playoff during each of those seasons (in fact, when Mets fans lament lost championships in 1987 and 1988, I often think to myself that 1984 and 1985 were lost championship opportunities, Doc Gooden at least twice in each playoff round would have been good for 2 wins each round).  Oh, let&#039;s not forget that in 1988 the club won 100 games and a division title. 

During Piazza&#039;s four year peak the Mets&#039; average record was 87-75; they had no first place finishes, two second place finishes which yielded Wild Cards, a divisional series win, and one NLCS, one third place finish, one last place finish with a losing record (average number of games back 10) - most importantly, no World Championships.

During those peak runs, Hernandez was MVP runner-up, top 5 in MVP voting twice, top 10 in MVP voting 3 times, a 4 time Gold Glove winner, 3-time All Star, and 1 time Silver Slugger.  During his peak runs, Piazza was top 5 in MVP voting once, top 10 in MVP voting twice, a 4 time All Star, and 4 time Silver Slugger.

In light of Hernandez&#039;s offensive and defensive performance during the most successful run of the club&#039;s history, I would argue that he is more deserving, and at least as deserving, of having his number retired than Piazza.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Support for Piazza seems stronger than for Hernandez, and it seems most posters feel it is inevitable that 31 will be retired &#8211; the only thing that might stand in its way is if Piazza is inducted into the HOF as a Dodger.  So, I want to claims that if Piazza&#8217;s 31 ought to be retired, then so should Hernandez&#8217;s 17.  I am a Hernandez partisan since my but I will try to make the case for Hernandez purely on the grounds that his personal achievement with the Mets was at least comparable to Piazza&#8217;s, and the team&#8217;s success was superior.  (As an aside, I want to point out Hernandez&#8217;s impact in helping to change the culture of the club into a winning one and the obvious reverence his Mets teammates hold for him.)</p>
<p>Hernandez (<a href="http://www.ultimatemets.com/profile.php?PlayerCode=0340" rel="nofollow">http://www.ultimatemets.com/profile.php?PlayerCode=0340</a>)<br />
Seas.  G   AB   R     H    HR    RBI     BB    IBB  AVG   SLG     OBP<br />
7     880 3164  455   939  80    468    471    59  .297  .429    .387  </p>
<p>Piazza (<a href="http://www.ultimatemets.com/profile.php?PlayerCode=0600" rel="nofollow">http://www.ultimatemets.com/profile.php?PlayerCode=0600</a>)<br />
Seas.  G   A     R    H    HR     RBI     BB     IBB    AVG    SLG    OBP<br />
8     972 3478 532   1028  220    655    424     82   .296    .542   .373</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll admit that Piazza&#8217;s numbers are better, but Hernandez is a surprisingly productive, and in 3 of his seasons (1983, 1988, and 1989) he played in fewer than 95 games for the Mets, whereas Piazza played at least 109 games in all but one season (yes, Piazza was more durable, so points to him).  However, if you go the websites I got the data from and look at Hernandez&#8217;s four peak seasons with the Mets, 1984-1987, you will see an extremely productive player; he averaged 15 HRs, 90 rbi, 88 runs scored, .305 avg.  Piazza&#8217;s four peak seasons (1999-2002):  37 HRs, 107 rbi, 85 runs scored, .302 avg.  I think it&#8217;s interesting to note that Piazza only generated about 15 more runs a season despite hitting about 22 more home runs a season. </p>
<p>During Hernandez&#8217;s four year peak the Mets&#8217; average record was 97-65; they had one first place finish, one NLCS, and one World Championship, as well as three second place finishes where average number of games back was four.  Had there been a Wild Card then, the Mets would have made the playoff during each of those seasons (in fact, when Mets fans lament lost championships in 1987 and 1988, I often think to myself that 1984 and 1985 were lost championship opportunities, Doc Gooden at least twice in each playoff round would have been good for 2 wins each round).  Oh, let&#8217;s not forget that in 1988 the club won 100 games and a division title. </p>
<p>During Piazza&#8217;s four year peak the Mets&#8217; average record was 87-75; they had no first place finishes, two second place finishes which yielded Wild Cards, a divisional series win, and one NLCS, one third place finish, one last place finish with a losing record (average number of games back 10) &#8211; most importantly, no World Championships.</p>
<p>During those peak runs, Hernandez was MVP runner-up, top 5 in MVP voting twice, top 10 in MVP voting 3 times, a 4 time Gold Glove winner, 3-time All Star, and 1 time Silver Slugger.  During his peak runs, Piazza was top 5 in MVP voting once, top 10 in MVP voting twice, a 4 time All Star, and 4 time Silver Slugger.</p>
<p>In light of Hernandez&#8217;s offensive and defensive performance during the most successful run of the club&#8217;s history, I would argue that he is more deserving, and at least as deserving, of having his number retired than Piazza.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opinion: Keith’s No. 17, and other News to Come — NYFSBlogs</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38414</link>
		<dc:creator>Opinion: Keith’s No. 17, and other News to Come — NYFSBlogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38414</guid>
		<description>[...] a post to Mets Merized Online, Ed Leyro argues that the Mets should retire No. 17, in honor of Keith [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a post to Mets Merized Online, Ed Leyro argues that the Mets should retire No. 17, in honor of Keith [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opinion: Keith’s No. 17, and other News to Come</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38421</link>
		<dc:creator>Opinion: Keith’s No. 17, and other News to Come</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38421</guid>
		<description>[...] a post to Mets Merized Online, Ed Leyro argues that the Mets should retire No. 17, in honor of Keith [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a post to Mets Merized Online, Ed Leyro argues that the Mets should retire No. 17, in honor of Keith [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38310</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 14:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38310</guid>
		<description>The only Mets PLAYER to have his number retired is Tom Seaver.  Seaver is the only Hall of Famer donning a Mets cap too.  I think Piazza will have his number retired when he reaches the Hall in 2012 (unless steroids allegations arise keeping him out of the Hall.)  And I don&#039;t know what&#039;s keeping Keith out of the Hall of Fame, but until he&#039;s in there (if ever) I don&#039;t foresee #17 being retired in his honor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only Mets PLAYER to have his number retired is Tom Seaver.  Seaver is the only Hall of Famer donning a Mets cap too.  I think Piazza will have his number retired when he reaches the Hall in 2012 (unless steroids allegations arise keeping him out of the Hall.)  And I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s keeping Keith out of the Hall of Fame, but until he&#8217;s in there (if ever) I don&#8217;t foresee #17 being retired in his honor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MackeyS</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38301</link>
		<dc:creator>MackeyS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 04:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38301</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re an idiot, seriously you have NO clue what you are talking about, does our Mommy know you are using her computer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re an idiot, seriously you have NO clue what you are talking about, does our Mommy know you are using her computer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mex_17</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38296</link>
		<dc:creator>Mex_17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 02:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38296</guid>
		<description>Reyes Who?  The hamstring guy?  If they want him in the Bronx, let&#039;s make a deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reyes Who?  The hamstring guy?  If they want him in the Bronx, let&#8217;s make a deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe D</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38196</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38196</guid>
		<description>Those of you clamoring for the Mets to retire Eddie Kranepool&#039;s number, I am with with you! But there is a major problem with that right now. Thanks to the bungling Mets, the uniform number 7 now belongs to Jose Reyes who now enters his eighth season with the Mets.

Wouldn&#039;t it be unwise for the Mets to yank his number at a time when so much is going wrong with the Mets?

Imagine the potential public relations disaster a disgruntled Jose Reyes would create, and we have all seen how Jose performs when he feels slighted. (think Willie Randolph)

And to do this when he is on the verge of entering free agency and in a position to bolt the Mets and replace Derek Jeter across town, would be yet another unmitigated disaster.

Be careful what you wish for. Until Reyes moves on from the Mets or retires, poor Eddie may have to wait another decade before seeing his number on the wall at CitiField.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of you clamoring for the Mets to retire Eddie Kranepool&#8217;s number, I am with with you! But there is a major problem with that right now. Thanks to the bungling Mets, the uniform number 7 now belongs to Jose Reyes who now enters his eighth season with the Mets.</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be unwise for the Mets to yank his number at a time when so much is going wrong with the Mets?</p>
<p>Imagine the potential public relations disaster a disgruntled Jose Reyes would create, and we have all seen how Jose performs when he feels slighted. (think Willie Randolph)</p>
<p>And to do this when he is on the verge of entering free agency and in a position to bolt the Mets and replace Derek Jeter across town, would be yet another unmitigated disaster.</p>
<p>Be careful what you wish for. Until Reyes moves on from the Mets or retires, poor Eddie may have to wait another decade before seeing his number on the wall at CitiField.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly H</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38168</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38168</guid>
		<description>Respect the &#039;Stache! Retire 17! I think you should start a campaign Ed :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Respect the &#8216;Stache! Retire 17! I think you should start a campaign Ed <img src='http://metsmerizedonline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PETER PETARDI</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38158</link>
		<dc:creator>PETER PETARDI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38158</guid>
		<description>ABSOLUTELY!!!! THESE ARE THE KIND OF DECISIONS THAT BAFFLE ME ABOUT OUR ORGINAZATION.KEITH WAS A ROCK FOR US, A CAPTAIN, A LEADER, A WORKHORSE, GREAT CLUBHOUSE GUY, HIT IN THE CLUTCH,SUPERIOR IN THE FIELD AS FAR AS I KNOW THE ONLY PLAYER IN METS HISTORY OTHER THAN JOHN FRANCO TO WEAR THE CAPTAIN C ON HIS JERSEY.GET IT DONE ALREADY GIMME A BREAK. RETIRE STRAW AND DOC TOO I WOULD SAY YES TO THEM TOO BECAUSE I LOVED THEM BUT THEY HAD ALOT OF PERSONAL AND OFF THE FIELD PROBLEMS WHICH IM SURE THE TEAM IS EMBARASSED BY.BUT THEY WERE LEGENDS FOR US AS FANS.GET KEITH DONE ALREADY WILPON MAKE US HAPPY FOR ONCE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABSOLUTELY!!!! THESE ARE THE KIND OF DECISIONS THAT BAFFLE ME ABOUT OUR ORGINAZATION.KEITH WAS A ROCK FOR US, A CAPTAIN, A LEADER, A WORKHORSE, GREAT CLUBHOUSE GUY, HIT IN THE CLUTCH,SUPERIOR IN THE FIELD AS FAR AS I KNOW THE ONLY PLAYER IN METS HISTORY OTHER THAN JOHN FRANCO TO WEAR THE CAPTAIN C ON HIS JERSEY.GET IT DONE ALREADY GIMME A BREAK. RETIRE STRAW AND DOC TOO I WOULD SAY YES TO THEM TOO BECAUSE I LOVED THEM BUT THEY HAD ALOT OF PERSONAL AND OFF THE FIELD PROBLEMS WHICH IM SURE THE TEAM IS EMBARASSED BY.BUT THEY WERE LEGENDS FOR US AS FANS.GET KEITH DONE ALREADY WILPON MAKE US HAPPY FOR ONCE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FP Mets</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38149</link>
		<dc:creator>FP Mets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38149</guid>
		<description>Absolutely on Kranepool. He stuck it out through thick and thin with this franchise and while he may not have been the face of it like a certain pitcher, I believe brand loyalty and integrity should pay dividends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely on Kranepool. He stuck it out through thick and thin with this franchise and while he may not have been the face of it like a certain pitcher, I believe brand loyalty and integrity should pay dividends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38146</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38146</guid>
		<description>I do not seeing retiring #8 in honor of Gary Carter - sorry - his tenure here was not that long and while he helped win the WS, I still don&#039;t think he did nearly enough to get that honor.

I would still like to see #7 - Ed Kranpool retired FIRST.  No, he doesn&#039;t have HOF numbers, but he is the only player to play his entire career as a Met and it wasn&#039;t too shabby nor short.

Keith brought many good aspects, but I still think of him as a Cardinal. In 88 he and Straw were at odds and campaigned heavily against him for Kevin McReynolds so I don&#039;t know how great he could have been in the Clubhouse at that point.

I&#039;m not sold on Keith quite yet (not saying NO, but.......)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not seeing retiring #8 in honor of Gary Carter &#8211; sorry &#8211; his tenure here was not that long and while he helped win the WS, I still don&#8217;t think he did nearly enough to get that honor.</p>
<p>I would still like to see #7 &#8211; Ed Kranpool retired FIRST.  No, he doesn&#8217;t have HOF numbers, but he is the only player to play his entire career as a Met and it wasn&#8217;t too shabby nor short.</p>
<p>Keith brought many good aspects, but I still think of him as a Cardinal. In 88 he and Straw were at odds and campaigned heavily against him for Kevin McReynolds so I don&#8217;t know how great he could have been in the Clubhouse at that point.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sold on Keith quite yet (not saying NO, but&#8230;&#8230;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38143</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38143</guid>
		<description>What?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38139</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38139</guid>
		<description>#31, #8, #18 and # 17.......mainly 31</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#31, #8, #18 and # 17&#8230;&#8230;.mainly 31</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38138</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38138</guid>
		<description>#31......I think they need to retire Mike`s number!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#31&#8230;&#8230;I think they need to retire Mike`s number!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Des</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38135</link>
		<dc:creator>Des</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38135</guid>
		<description>Not so fast.

Soon the Mets will have no numbers for the team on the field.

I&#039;ve think that with all the fans in mind, the Mets need to go to a three digit system:
#31, #16, #18, #5, #7, #57 become #031, #016, #018, #005, #007, #057

That would please future fans too who would have their say !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so fast.</p>
<p>Soon the Mets will have no numbers for the team on the field.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve think that with all the fans in mind, the Mets need to go to a three digit system:<br />
#31, #16, #18, #5, #7, #57 become #031, #016, #018, #005, #007, #057</p>
<p>That would please future fans too who would have their say !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike B.</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38119</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38119</guid>
		<description>and #31 and #16 and #18 and hopefully someday #5, #7 and #57</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and #31 and #16 and #18 and hopefully someday #5, #7 and #57</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theonlymaskman</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38112</link>
		<dc:creator>theonlymaskman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38112</guid>
		<description>Ed, Thanks for the fine article.  It&#039;s past time for the Mets to retire #17.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, Thanks for the fine article.  It&#8217;s past time for the Mets to retire #17.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vegasChris</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/01/reason-17-to-retire-keith-hernandezs-number.html/comment-page-1#comment-38111</link>
		<dc:creator>vegasChris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=19010#comment-38111</guid>
		<description>absolutely agree 100%, its a damn shame his number along with Gooden, and Strawberrys numbers should be retired. You can even make a case for Carters number too. I say retire all 4 numbers this year and do it soon so the Mets can have some kinda good news in the media instead of being the laughing stock they are now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>absolutely agree 100%, its a damn shame his number along with Gooden, and Strawberrys numbers should be retired. You can even make a case for Carters number too. I say retire all 4 numbers this year and do it soon so the Mets can have some kinda good news in the media instead of being the laughing stock they are now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
