<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evaluating David Wright With Stats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=evaluating-david-wright-with-stats</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:16:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33242</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33242</guid>
		<description>well in a way bayoone is right-2009 risp and 2 outs, wright hit 200, in 2008- 247, in 2007-200, 2006-358, so the last 3 years bayoone is right, Wright is not clutch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well in a way bayoone is right-2009 risp and 2 outs, wright hit 200, in 2008- 247, in 2007-200, 2006-358, so the last 3 years bayoone is right, Wright is not clutch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim b</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33240</link>
		<dc:creator>jim b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33240</guid>
		<description>Would you much rather have ball player with a lot of substance but only averages .240, or David Wright who hits over .300?  

I think after the 2009 season you represent a part of the Mets fan base who blames everyone on the team for what went wrong, when really Wright had a bad year, but even if he had a good year it wouldn&#039;t have made a difference</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you much rather have ball player with a lot of substance but only averages .240, or David Wright who hits over .300?  </p>
<p>I think after the 2009 season you represent a part of the Mets fan base who blames everyone on the team for what went wrong, when really Wright had a bad year, but even if he had a good year it wouldn&#8217;t have made a difference</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan_S</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33215</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan_S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33215</guid>
		<description>My previous comment was meant for Bayonne not LGNYM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My previous comment was meant for Bayonne not LGNYM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan_S</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33214</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan_S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33214</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re an idiot. You are 100%, pure, raw, uncut idiot. Thanks for playing though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re an idiot. You are 100%, pure, raw, uncut idiot. Thanks for playing though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LGNYM</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33180</link>
		<dc:creator>LGNYM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33180</guid>
		<description>Jeter won so many rings b/c he was part of a great team.  If Jeter was on any other team, he wouldn&#039;t be nearly as praised as he is.  Sure he was a big part of the team, but he didn&#039;t do it alone, and he rarely was the most productive player on his team.  And there were plenty of times Jeter didn&#039;t get the big hit and other guys did. Thats what good teams do, they pick each other up. 

And Francesa isn&#039;t any kind of baseball genius, so I really wouldn&#039;t care what he thought of my opinion nor what the people who call into the FAN think.  The idiots who call into the FAN are more of your type who moronically dismiss stats entirely.

A-Rod is a vastly better player than Jeter its not even remotely close.  Fine I&#039;ll give you a pass if you don&#039;t want to say Wright is better or as good as Jeter, since he hasn&#039;t been as good for as long, but to say Jeter is better than A-Rod is just flat out ridiculous.  

You are probably one of those people who think David Eckstein is a superstar just cause he&#039;s gritty and tries real hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeter won so many rings b/c he was part of a great team.  If Jeter was on any other team, he wouldn&#8217;t be nearly as praised as he is.  Sure he was a big part of the team, but he didn&#8217;t do it alone, and he rarely was the most productive player on his team.  And there were plenty of times Jeter didn&#8217;t get the big hit and other guys did. Thats what good teams do, they pick each other up. </p>
<p>And Francesa isn&#8217;t any kind of baseball genius, so I really wouldn&#8217;t care what he thought of my opinion nor what the people who call into the FAN think.  The idiots who call into the FAN are more of your type who moronically dismiss stats entirely.</p>
<p>A-Rod is a vastly better player than Jeter its not even remotely close.  Fine I&#8217;ll give you a pass if you don&#8217;t want to say Wright is better or as good as Jeter, since he hasn&#8217;t been as good for as long, but to say Jeter is better than A-Rod is just flat out ridiculous.  </p>
<p>You are probably one of those people who think David Eckstein is a superstar just cause he&#8217;s gritty and tries real hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bayonne Mets Fan</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33166</link>
		<dc:creator>Bayonne Mets Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33166</guid>
		<description>Wow,

That response is about as horrible as it gets.  I&#039;m going to give you a response with NO STATS.

All you did was look at what was on paper and come to your conclusions.
I could have said to somebody.... here are 2 pieces of paper with the statistics of each ballplayer.  Now write me a term paper based on these stats.

That term paper would have looked like your response.

If you called WFAN and presented that argument you would be ripped to shreds.  Francesa would give you the hand wave after your first couple of sentences.

Oh God, So Jeter only had a couple of great years. I guess getting HUGE hits in the biggest games during the biggest playoff games, in the biggest sports stage in the world doesn&#039;t count, or even during the biggest regular season games.  I guess making great defensive plays that make or break your teams pennant chances don&#039;t count either?  I guess having other players, including your boy A-Rod praise your glory and be humbled to be even on the same team as you doesn&#039;t count either.

David Wright would need about 8 magical seasons and several world series wins to achieve something like that.  Listen, David Wright was with good players in 2006-2008 and had a chance to contribute to his own destiny.  He failed.  

And this year David Wright has dogged it running out ground balls more than he ever did.  That is something Jeter NEVER, EVER does in his entire career.

Hey, Wright still has a lot of years left and he can change things just like Alex Rodriguez did this post season.  I would be as ignorant as you if i were to believe that Wright could not change.  I&#039;m not so sure about it because he&#039;s too much of a numbers collector and a big softee to do it, but it is possible.

It&#039;s not a Hate David Wright post but a lot of DW Cool Aid drinkers need to be reminded of his shortcomings.

But he&#039;ll have his moments though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow,</p>
<p>That response is about as horrible as it gets.  I&#8217;m going to give you a response with NO STATS.</p>
<p>All you did was look at what was on paper and come to your conclusions.<br />
I could have said to somebody&#8230;. here are 2 pieces of paper with the statistics of each ballplayer.  Now write me a term paper based on these stats.</p>
<p>That term paper would have looked like your response.</p>
<p>If you called WFAN and presented that argument you would be ripped to shreds.  Francesa would give you the hand wave after your first couple of sentences.</p>
<p>Oh God, So Jeter only had a couple of great years. I guess getting HUGE hits in the biggest games during the biggest playoff games, in the biggest sports stage in the world doesn&#8217;t count, or even during the biggest regular season games.  I guess making great defensive plays that make or break your teams pennant chances don&#8217;t count either?  I guess having other players, including your boy A-Rod praise your glory and be humbled to be even on the same team as you doesn&#8217;t count either.</p>
<p>David Wright would need about 8 magical seasons and several world series wins to achieve something like that.  Listen, David Wright was with good players in 2006-2008 and had a chance to contribute to his own destiny.  He failed.  </p>
<p>And this year David Wright has dogged it running out ground balls more than he ever did.  That is something Jeter NEVER, EVER does in his entire career.</p>
<p>Hey, Wright still has a lot of years left and he can change things just like Alex Rodriguez did this post season.  I would be as ignorant as you if i were to believe that Wright could not change.  I&#8217;m not so sure about it because he&#8217;s too much of a numbers collector and a big softee to do it, but it is possible.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a Hate David Wright post but a lot of DW Cool Aid drinkers need to be reminded of his shortcomings.</p>
<p>But he&#8217;ll have his moments though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LGNYM</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33155</link>
		<dc:creator>LGNYM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33155</guid>
		<description>Well for starters I certainly wouldn&#039;t say an RBI in a gm where the Mets were down 3 runs was unimportant.  I&#039;d hope our players wouldn&#039;t be giving up ABs in those situations.  

But FWIW,  I don&#039;t know what he hit with RISP in difference situations, but he did hit .313 overall in ABs where the game was tied.

Wright had an off year, and the Mets do need him to be better next yr, but he wasn&#039;t as bad as the panickers make it seem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well for starters I certainly wouldn&#8217;t say an RBI in a gm where the Mets were down 3 runs was unimportant.  I&#8217;d hope our players wouldn&#8217;t be giving up ABs in those situations.  </p>
<p>But FWIW,  I don&#8217;t know what he hit with RISP in difference situations, but he did hit .313 overall in ABs where the game was tied.</p>
<p>Wright had an off year, and the Mets do need him to be better next yr, but he wasn&#8217;t as bad as the panickers make it seem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LGNYM</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33154</link>
		<dc:creator>LGNYM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33154</guid>
		<description>First off, I&#039;ll compare whoever the heck I want to compare.  

Secondly, regular stats are much more based on team performance. The newer stats are a much better measure for performance. People who dismiss stats are morons.  Stats are the truth, whatever opinions people form about players who look the best are just that, opinions. So I&#039;ll take a player like Dunn on my team any day, I&#039;ll take &quot;unclutch&quot; and &quot;ungrity&quot; A-Rod over Jeter 1000 times out of 1000. 

As for Wright and Jeter, even using &quot;regular stats&quot; even in an off year Wright compares well to a typical season of Jeter.  Wright in a good year is the much more productive player since Jeter typically doesn&#039;t have as much power.  So even comparing Wright&#039;s off year to a typical season of Jeter, they are rather similar.  Jeter&#039;s career average is a bit higher than what Wright hit this yr, Wright&#039;s OBP this yr was a bit higher than Jeter&#039;s career, but neither difference was that huge.  And as far as the power numbers go Jeter&#039;s season average is about 16 HR, 31 2b, and 76 RBI a year.

Most of what has made Jeter great is that he&#039;s been a good player for a long time.  He&#039;s going to get 3000 hits b/c he&#039;s had a long career, and been good for the duration of it.  He&#039;s been good for a long time, but he&#039;s really only had a couple of &quot;great&quot; years in his career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, I&#8217;ll compare whoever the heck I want to compare.  </p>
<p>Secondly, regular stats are much more based on team performance. The newer stats are a much better measure for performance. People who dismiss stats are morons.  Stats are the truth, whatever opinions people form about players who look the best are just that, opinions. So I&#8217;ll take a player like Dunn on my team any day, I&#8217;ll take &#8220;unclutch&#8221; and &#8220;ungrity&#8221; A-Rod over Jeter 1000 times out of 1000. </p>
<p>As for Wright and Jeter, even using &#8220;regular stats&#8221; even in an off year Wright compares well to a typical season of Jeter.  Wright in a good year is the much more productive player since Jeter typically doesn&#8217;t have as much power.  So even comparing Wright&#8217;s off year to a typical season of Jeter, they are rather similar.  Jeter&#8217;s career average is a bit higher than what Wright hit this yr, Wright&#8217;s OBP this yr was a bit higher than Jeter&#8217;s career, but neither difference was that huge.  And as far as the power numbers go Jeter&#8217;s season average is about 16 HR, 31 2b, and 76 RBI a year.</p>
<p>Most of what has made Jeter great is that he&#8217;s been a good player for a long time.  He&#8217;s going to get 3000 hits b/c he&#8217;s had a long career, and been good for the duration of it.  He&#8217;s been good for a long time, but he&#8217;s really only had a couple of &#8220;great&#8221; years in his career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mex_17</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33137</link>
		<dc:creator>Mex_17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33137</guid>
		<description>I enjoy some of the new stats for baseball, but mostly I enjoy watching the games as entertainment and with storylines.  Rooting for sports teams is inherently irrational and nonsensical.  Trying to turn it into Newton&#039;s laws doesn&#039;t work for me. 

For one thing, the new stats are not bulletproof.  OPS commits statistical heresy of adding unlike averages.  Not to mention that slugging percentage is founded on the misguided assumption that a HR is exactly twice as valuable as a double, which is patently false. 

Regarding Wright:
- I think Wright himself would say he had a bad year.  So is a MLB player wrong in evaluating his own performance? 

- I think Wright has been hyped to be one of the best players in MLB, and that&#039;s what Met fans are expecting.  So even if he performs &quot;very good&quot;, people aren&#039;t going to be happy. 

- I don&#039;t think 3B is that crucial of a defensive position, compared to SS, 2B, CF, and even C.  (And Wright&#039;s defense wasn&#039;t good this year.)

- Talking about performing &quot;in the clutch&quot;, I know that is definitely overblown, but given that all humans can be shown to performly different under pressure, and MLB players are human beings, I&#039;m not sure how anyone can say that pressure has zero effect on all MLB players. There were definitely at bats last year where Wright looked very uncomfortable at the plate.  I have no stats to back that up. 

- I consider watching a player fail in key spots to be like getting a bad meal at a good restaurant.  If you go to a nice restaurant with great food, loved by most people, and you get bad oysters and spend all night throwing up, you&#039;re not going to want to go back there.  Other people will say you&#039;re crazy, statistically speaking the odds of getting bad oysters there are say 1 in 10,000.  Nonetheless, when you&#039;re deciding where to go for dinner, you&#039;ll have a visceral reaction to going back to that restaurant.  I think sports are the same way.  Although numbers may more accurately reflect things, people are fanatical about sports because they promote visceral reactions. So I think it gets old for stat people to go off on how stupid everyone else for not loving players based only on stats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy some of the new stats for baseball, but mostly I enjoy watching the games as entertainment and with storylines.  Rooting for sports teams is inherently irrational and nonsensical.  Trying to turn it into Newton&#8217;s laws doesn&#8217;t work for me. </p>
<p>For one thing, the new stats are not bulletproof.  OPS commits statistical heresy of adding unlike averages.  Not to mention that slugging percentage is founded on the misguided assumption that a HR is exactly twice as valuable as a double, which is patently false. </p>
<p>Regarding Wright:<br />
- I think Wright himself would say he had a bad year.  So is a MLB player wrong in evaluating his own performance? </p>
<p>- I think Wright has been hyped to be one of the best players in MLB, and that&#8217;s what Met fans are expecting.  So even if he performs &#8220;very good&#8221;, people aren&#8217;t going to be happy. </p>
<p>- I don&#8217;t think 3B is that crucial of a defensive position, compared to SS, 2B, CF, and even C.  (And Wright&#8217;s defense wasn&#8217;t good this year.)</p>
<p>- Talking about performing &#8220;in the clutch&#8221;, I know that is definitely overblown, but given that all humans can be shown to performly different under pressure, and MLB players are human beings, I&#8217;m not sure how anyone can say that pressure has zero effect on all MLB players. There were definitely at bats last year where Wright looked very uncomfortable at the plate.  I have no stats to back that up. </p>
<p>- I consider watching a player fail in key spots to be like getting a bad meal at a good restaurant.  If you go to a nice restaurant with great food, loved by most people, and you get bad oysters and spend all night throwing up, you&#8217;re not going to want to go back there.  Other people will say you&#8217;re crazy, statistically speaking the odds of getting bad oysters there are say 1 in 10,000.  Nonetheless, when you&#8217;re deciding where to go for dinner, you&#8217;ll have a visceral reaction to going back to that restaurant.  I think sports are the same way.  Although numbers may more accurately reflect things, people are fanatical about sports because they promote visceral reactions. So I think it gets old for stat people to go off on how stupid everyone else for not loving players based only on stats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdon</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33118</link>
		<dc:creator>jdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33118</guid>
		<description>My point is that he displayed some of these less talent more brain characteristics in 2008.  So i expected them in 2009.  I am just not sure he is talented enough or smart enough to make up for it.  It would not bother me if they brought in someone better.  He may have upside, but how much can he have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is that he displayed some of these less talent more brain characteristics in 2008.  So i expected them in 2009.  I am just not sure he is talented enough or smart enough to make up for it.  It would not bother me if they brought in someone better.  He may have upside, but how much can he have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bayonne Mets Fan</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33113</link>
		<dc:creator>Bayonne Mets Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33113</guid>
		<description>There is never any excuse to remotely compare ANYTHING between Derek Jeter and David Wright. 

That ridiculous comparison only proves my point that those new fancy stats mean NOTHING.  They tell you nothing about content, nothing about the substance of a ballplayer.

You can numerize anything you do in life, proves nothing.

They&#039;re good for negotiating with agents according to Bob Costas and I agree with him.  The normal regular stats are pretty much all you need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is never any excuse to remotely compare ANYTHING between Derek Jeter and David Wright. </p>
<p>That ridiculous comparison only proves my point that those new fancy stats mean NOTHING.  They tell you nothing about content, nothing about the substance of a ballplayer.</p>
<p>You can numerize anything you do in life, proves nothing.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re good for negotiating with agents according to Bob Costas and I agree with him.  The normal regular stats are pretty much all you need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33112</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33112</guid>
		<description>Good read- http://www.thebaseballopinion.com/?p=1895</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good read- <a href="http://www.thebaseballopinion.com/?p=1895" rel="nofollow">http://www.thebaseballopinion.com/?p=1895</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sixxis</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33111</link>
		<dc:creator>sixxis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33111</guid>
		<description>What you fail to note regarding your stats: How many times did David Wright come through driving in a run, after the Mets were already down 7-4 but, early when it was still a tie game or the Mets down by a run he struck out or popped up? He is a great player but last year he was miserable when it counted! He didn&#039;t adjust to the way he was being pitched to and he constantly flailed at pitches out of the strike zone. And what made things worse, his fielding suffered because of it. Yes I&#039;ll take him over any other 3B but I&#039;d like for him to make in-game adjustments, also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you fail to note regarding your stats: How many times did David Wright come through driving in a run, after the Mets were already down 7-4 but, early when it was still a tie game or the Mets down by a run he struck out or popped up? He is a great player but last year he was miserable when it counted! He didn&#8217;t adjust to the way he was being pitched to and he constantly flailed at pitches out of the strike zone. And what made things worse, his fielding suffered because of it. Yes I&#8217;ll take him over any other 3B but I&#8217;d like for him to make in-game adjustments, also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LGNYM</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33110</link>
		<dc:creator>LGNYM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33110</guid>
		<description>David Wright had a bad year for David Wright, but what was a bad year for Wright would be a very good year for most players in the league.  He still put up a 123 OPS+ (and yes I used those fancy stats...screw those who think stats are meaningless)...for comparison sake, Derek Jeter who is a future HOFer has a career OPS+ of 121.  Wright&#039;s HRs and RBI were down, but he still hit for a solid average, got on base at a great rate, etc so its not like he was completely awful in all facets.  

Going forward, the Mets will need Wright&#039;s power to return...they aren&#039;t going to win with him being the productive player he&#039;s been the 4 yrs prior.  So I do understand the concern about it in that respect, but people blaming him for the Mets season this yr and acting like he &quot;let the team down&quot; or whatnot, need to realize that with as awful as the Mets team were this yr, Wright coulda hit 40 HR and the Mets still wouldn&#039;t have sniffed the postseason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Wright had a bad year for David Wright, but what was a bad year for Wright would be a very good year for most players in the league.  He still put up a 123 OPS+ (and yes I used those fancy stats&#8230;screw those who think stats are meaningless)&#8230;for comparison sake, Derek Jeter who is a future HOFer has a career OPS+ of 121.  Wright&#8217;s HRs and RBI were down, but he still hit for a solid average, got on base at a great rate, etc so its not like he was completely awful in all facets.  </p>
<p>Going forward, the Mets will need Wright&#8217;s power to return&#8230;they aren&#8217;t going to win with him being the productive player he&#8217;s been the 4 yrs prior.  So I do understand the concern about it in that respect, but people blaming him for the Mets season this yr and acting like he &#8220;let the team down&#8221; or whatnot, need to realize that with as awful as the Mets team were this yr, Wright coulda hit 40 HR and the Mets still wouldn&#8217;t have sniffed the postseason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33109</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33109</guid>
		<description>Danny is right. To call Murphy inept shows how little you know about the game. Are we all forgetting that this was a player in his first full season who was thrust into two different positions he had never played before and still held his own? It&#039;s Minaya who is inept, not Murphy. Mets fans will appreciate Murphy more once he&#039;s gone and helps another team become a playoff contender. Then all the outcry will come about how we should have never traded him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny is right. To call Murphy inept shows how little you know about the game. Are we all forgetting that this was a player in his first full season who was thrust into two different positions he had never played before and still held his own? It&#8217;s Minaya who is inept, not Murphy. Mets fans will appreciate Murphy more once he&#8217;s gone and helps another team become a playoff contender. Then all the outcry will come about how we should have never traded him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe D</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33095</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33095</guid>
		<description>You really did your research on this one and I enjoyed reading it. I think most of the frustration with David Wright stems from disappointment rather than anything else. I still think he deserves a second chance to prove the power void was a fluke before we proclaim that it&#039;s the new norm. I think the hitting with 2 outs and runners on base definitely created a bad perception of his overall season as you suggest. But those split stats fluctuate so much from season to season and it&#039;s usually too small a sample size to base an overall judgment on. I bet he&#039;ll have a typical David Wright season in 2010. He will be spending two weeks with HoJo after the this holiday weekend to learn to start pulling the ball a little more without harming his batting average or OBP. Francoeur will also be going as he seeks to become a more patient hitter. Hopefully HoJo has a positive effect. Happy Thanksgiving to everyone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really did your research on this one and I enjoyed reading it. I think most of the frustration with David Wright stems from disappointment rather than anything else. I still think he deserves a second chance to prove the power void was a fluke before we proclaim that it&#8217;s the new norm. I think the hitting with 2 outs and runners on base definitely created a bad perception of his overall season as you suggest. But those split stats fluctuate so much from season to season and it&#8217;s usually too small a sample size to base an overall judgment on. I bet he&#8217;ll have a typical David Wright season in 2010. He will be spending two weeks with HoJo after the this holiday weekend to learn to start pulling the ball a little more without harming his batting average or OBP. Francoeur will also be going as he seeks to become a more patient hitter. Hopefully HoJo has a positive effect. Happy Thanksgiving to everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shamik</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33086</link>
		<dc:creator>Shamik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33086</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m beginning to think Wright is over-rated. Yes, I understand that the stats show he&#039;s got a good avg. with runner in scoring position. But clearly most of those times were when the Mets were up 4-1 or 5-3 or something. How many times did he come through in the 8th or 9th when we needed it? And what the hell happened to hitting it out of the park!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m beginning to think Wright is over-rated. Yes, I understand that the stats show he&#8217;s got a good avg. with runner in scoring position. But clearly most of those times were when the Mets were up 4-1 or 5-3 or something. How many times did he come through in the 8th or 9th when we needed it? And what the hell happened to hitting it out of the park!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob L</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33082</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33082</guid>
		<description>Geez, i hear ya jdon, but i see the glass &#039;half-full&#039; with Murphy. Think about how much pressure the kid had with his disastrous &#039;fling&#039; in our spacious/cavernous LF and how that had to impact his hitting productivity. 
Then, he had to learn 1B and flubbed that, initially. 
All in all, i think the jury has still got to be &#039;out&#039; on him. 
i think i detect some decent hitting acumen by the kid. If we can pair him with a vet, i think he&#039;ll begin to blossom in 2010.
i doubt the Mets trade him or deny him another shot. i do believe in 2010, i can see him hitting 15HRS, 75 RBI&#039;s and hit around 280. Not great, not even good for a 1b, butthat might be the beginning...and i think he can learn to play the position well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez, i hear ya jdon, but i see the glass &#8216;half-full&#8217; with Murphy. Think about how much pressure the kid had with his disastrous &#8216;fling&#8217; in our spacious/cavernous LF and how that had to impact his hitting productivity.<br />
Then, he had to learn 1B and flubbed that, initially.<br />
All in all, i think the jury has still got to be &#8216;out&#8217; on him.<br />
i think i detect some decent hitting acumen by the kid. If we can pair him with a vet, i think he&#8217;ll begin to blossom in 2010.<br />
i doubt the Mets trade him or deny him another shot. i do believe in 2010, i can see him hitting 15HRS, 75 RBI&#8217;s and hit around 280. Not great, not even good for a 1b, butthat might be the beginning&#8230;and i think he can learn to play the position well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdon</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33079</link>
		<dc:creator>jdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33079</guid>
		<description>Here is my take on Murphy:  I actually think that he has all the physical skills to be a very good first baseman.  His mental decisions were atrocious, though, and they were not all related to inexperience at the position.  They were related to thinking the game, knowing how many outs there were, things like that.  A person looks at Murphy and expects him to be more cerebral.  He is not physically gifted although he has a good arm for first base.  He is very slow on the basepaths yet still takes foolish chances.  He is a fairly patient hitter who does not get a lot of walks.  He has a slow bat as well.  In short, he is a bit of an enigma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my take on Murphy:  I actually think that he has all the physical skills to be a very good first baseman.  His mental decisions were atrocious, though, and they were not all related to inexperience at the position.  They were related to thinking the game, knowing how many outs there were, things like that.  A person looks at Murphy and expects him to be more cerebral.  He is not physically gifted although he has a good arm for first base.  He is very slow on the basepaths yet still takes foolish chances.  He is a fairly patient hitter who does not get a lot of walks.  He has a slow bat as well.  In short, he is a bit of an enigma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://metsmerizedonline.com/2009/11/evaluating-david-wright-with-stats.html#comment-33077</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metsmerizedonline.com/?p=16454#comment-33077</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Bob about Murphy.I believe if ginen the starting job at 1st,he will show how good he is.If he is batting 7th behind Francour and in front of Molina/barajas he will hit 45-50 doubles 15-20 homers 75-85 ribbies also while walking 60-70 times.I think those people out there could be surprised how good he could be.They have to remember he had to learn 2 different positions at the big league level,with a team full of injuries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Bob about Murphy.I believe if ginen the starting job at 1st,he will show how good he is.If he is batting 7th behind Francour and in front of Molina/barajas he will hit 45-50 doubles 15-20 homers 75-85 ribbies also while walking 60-70 times.I think those people out there could be surprised how good he could be.They have to remember he had to learn 2 different positions at the big league level,with a team full of injuries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.001 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 446/447 objects using memcached

Served from: metsmerizedonline.com @ 2012-02-13 02:19:03 -->
